<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Owners View &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ownersview.com/category/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ownersview.com</link>
	<description>Get the Right Perspective on Your Priorities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:15:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Leveraging Customers in Contract Negotiations</title>
		<link>http://ownersview.com/contract-negotiations-leveraging-customers-in-contract-negotiations/</link>
		<comments>http://ownersview.com/contract-negotiations-leveraging-customers-in-contract-negotiations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan Triplett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LivingSocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small business management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ownersview.com/?p=1659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My colleague, Dan Diener, was working with client who was re-negotiating an existing contract that was up for renewal. It ran into a snag because the contract was for a higher amount than the previous year in order to be in line with our client&#8217;s other contracts. This was crucial since our client provides personnel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1682" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 473px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-1682" href="http://ownersview.com/2011/06/contract-negotiations-leveraging-customers-in-contract-negotiations/penguinbunnybydanielvoyager-2/"><img class="size-full wp-image-1682" title="PenguinbunnybyDanielVoyager" src="http://ownersview.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/PenguinbunnybyDanielVoyager1.jpg" alt="" width="463" height="365" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sometimes big &amp; small can work together. Photo by Daniel Voyager</p></div>
<p>My colleague, Dan Diener, was working with client who was re-negotiating an existing contract that was up for renewal. It ran into a snag because the contract was for a higher amount than the previous year in order to be in line with our client&#8217;s other contracts. This was crucial since our client provides personnel to others and significant benefits to his employees.</p>
<p>Our client, based in Austin, Texas, is a small business with a very large state client. Because of the nature of the industry and how these two organizations work together and share information, the decision was made to talk to the larger client about the situation. The result was a good rationale to stand firm on price by leveraging the larger client. Our client said no, he could not honor the same deal he had with the state client if he cut the price for this existing client. The contract was signed at the price our client proposed. Honor and ethics were well served as well.</p>
<p>This was an unusual situation. Frequently, a larger client wants a &#8220;discount&#8221; for the prestige of working with them. But, it can work in your favor when someone else wants the &#8220;discount&#8221;. Don&#8217;t feel you have to give in. Stand firm for your existing customers and leverage them when appropriate.</p>
<p>You can use this strategy also when dealing with Daily Deal coupon buyers who want more than they bought. You have negotiated a deal with an online coupon marketing company and you should stick to the deal. In a recent article <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/212328-2/groupon_nightmares_and_how_to_avoid_them.html"><em>Groupon Nightmare</em>s</a> by Sarah Jacobson Purewal for Entrepreneur, she cites the case of <a href="http://soundrootsmusic.com">Sound Roots</a>, a music school in Oregon. When numerous people called to try to bend the rules and get more than the value of the LivingSocial coupon, owner Fara Heath, told her manager to say, &#8220;This is a very good deal, and take it for what it&#8217;s worth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ownersview.com/contract-negotiations-leveraging-customers-in-contract-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choosing Business Entity Should Not Be a Popularity Contest</title>
		<link>http://ownersview.com/business-entity-choice-should-not-be-a-popularity-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://ownersview.com/business-entity-choice-should-not-be-a-popularity-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan Triplett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal entity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margin Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sole Proprietorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ownersview.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone has an opinion and they are passionate about it. All you have to do is read a somewhat contentious set of recent posts on Refresh Austin. Back and forth they went for several days. The person who posted that query probably did not think she would raise a firestorm. She did. And, those who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_75" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-75" title="Paperwork sucks" src="http://ownersview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Paperwork-sucks-300x166.jpg" alt="Paperwork sucks" width="300" height="166" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Paperwork sucks</p></div>
<p>Everyone has an opinion and they are passionate about it.</p>
<p>All you have to do is read a somewhat contentious set of recent posts on <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/refresh-austin/browse_thread/thread/668e45b15cee67c3">Refresh Austin</a>. Back and forth they went for several days. The person who posted that query probably did not think she would raise a firestorm. She did.</p>
<p>And, those who commented weren’t even the usual set of “professionals”. Get a group of them together in the same room and the fur really flies on this issue. I know I have done this.</p>
<p><em>Ask a lawyer</em>. They will usually say: “You must be an <strong>LLC</strong>.” (As my mother would say, “Maybe they are poets and don’t know it.”) Why? For liability’s sake.</p>
<p>My question: If you don’t have enough high dollar assets worth protecting, is this really the right choice? Especially since there is limited case law (dating only back to 1977) on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability_corporation#United_States"><strong>Limited Liability Companies</strong></a> in comparison to…</p>
<p><em>The accountant’</em>s traditional favorite: <strong>The Corporation.</strong> It used to be they swore that the <strong>Sub S</strong> or <strong>S Corp</strong> entity was the place to be.  Why? Taxes, of course. That is, unless you needed to keep the profits in your company at the end of the year. Or if the US Congress hadn&#8217;t kept taking away all the reasons to choose it over other forms.</p>
<p>Now a regular corporation, sometimes called a <strong>C-Corp</strong>, straight C or an LLC is the flavor of the month. And, there’s always the <strong>PC</strong>. No, not a computer but a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_corporation"><strong>Professional Corporation</strong></a>, loved by doctors, and lawyers, accountants and licensed Indian Chiefs.</p>
<p>But I want to know: Do you really want all the paperwork and other hassles of a corporation? As the picture above demonstrates, keeping up with this stuff and staying legal so that some smart lawyer can’t pierce your “<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil"><strong>Corporate Veil</strong></a>” is time consuming and sucks the life right out of you.</p>
<p>Of course, if you plan to raise investment capital, find partners or sell this sucker and get your money out, generally speaking it will be more valuable and easier if you are a corporation. No promises though.</p>
<p>As someone who has spent 27 years helping owners grow their businesses, I want to add my two cents. In small <em>business management</em>, I have found that the two best choices are:</p>
<p><strong>Be what <em>your best customer</em> wants and expects you to be.</strong> Sales and marketing issues may play a big role in your decision and impact your success.</p>
<p>Behind closed doors, Dell Corporation will admit that they want their suppliers to be corporations, too. They don’t want to deal with 1099 tax forms and they don’t really understand sole proprietorship businesses all that well.</p>
<p>You may find this true of status-conscious consumers, other very large businesses or often smaller ones who just feel a corporation or LLC is less likely to fold. (Check with Lehman Brothers customers about this.)</p>
<p><strong>Be what <em>you</em> want to be</strong>. Except for the fact that legally you cannot choose to call yourself a <strong>Partnership</strong> unless you have at least one other person who owns part of the business, you can be anything. You can decide what is right for you.</p>
<p>You can always start out as a <strong>Sole Proprietorship</strong>. In Texas, you don&#8217;t have to even register it although there are some cities that require home-based businesses to register. Then later you can move up the legal formation model to Corporation or LLC. You can move back from being a Corporation to a less complex form, but it is harder. Just ask your lawyer.</p>
<p>I know you don’t want to forget about taxes &#8211; including state taxes. Texas says it has no business tax, except it has the <a href="http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/franchise/index.html"><strong>Margin Tax</strong></a>, aka <strong>Franchise Tax</strong> — these are not just for franchises either. Rule of thumb, the simpler the cheaper. So, again a Sole Proprietorship might still be a good choice. (Also good for being able to deduct your health insurance.)</p>
<p>And, what about those liability issues that get most people stirred up? I don&#8217;t sell insurance, but I know from working with clients who have legitimate concerns, that generally like the ad says, &#8220;there&#8217;s an insurance for that&#8221;. This could be cheaper than choosing a more complicated business form when you add in the costs of maintaining the records and fulfilling the other requirements of a corporation, for instance.</p>
<p>In the end, what matters most is how you see yourself and how you want to world to see you. There are always trade-offs. Listen, evaluate what you hear and read but choose for yourself.</p>
<p>I like being an S Corp, I think of it as “Status Corp” that I have earned through the professional way I run my business and help others run theirs the right way.</p>
<p>So now, that you have heard my side of the story, what is your take? How did you decide?</p>
<p><em>Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cjscott69/">chrisscott</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ownersview.com/business-entity-choice-should-not-be-a-popularity-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

